autovacuum_max_parallel_workers
Fact — official short description: “Maximum number of parallel workers that can be used by a single autovacuum worker.”
Identity
Lifecycle
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| First observed | PG19 Beta 3 |
| Present in | PG19 Beta 3 |
| Removed in | No |
| Introduction commit | 1ff3180ca016 — Allow autovacuum to use parallel vacuum workers. |
| Commit date | 2026-04-06 |
| Discussion | thread 1 |
Default history
| Versions | Raw boot_val |
Unit | Human value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG19 Beta 3 | 0 |
— | 0 |
How it works
PostgreSQL describes autovacuum_max_parallel_workers as follows: “Maximum number of parallel workers that can be used by a single autovacuum worker.” A configuration reload applies the value to the server without a full restart. The atlas measures it in PG19 Beta 3; boot_val is the compiled or initialized baseline, not proof of a running cluster’s effective setting.
The limit applies per autovacuum worker and only to index vacuuming and index-cleanup phases. Zero disables parallel autovacuum; the actual count is also capped by max_parallel_workers, while each participating worker consumes CPU and maintenance memory.
Read it together with autovacuum_max_workers, autovacuum_worker_slots, max_parallel_workers, maintenance_work_mem. Check SHOW and pg_settings on the target server, verify the source and pending_restart fields, and compare workload, logs, and resource metrics before and after any change.
Tuning advice
Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.
| Workload | Guidance |
|---|---|
| OLTP | Start at the upstream default and use pg_stat_autovacuum_scores, table churn, freeze age, queueing, and foreground latency to justify a change. Protect wraparound work and avoid letting a busy-table preference starve quieter tables. |
| OLAP | Batch-heavy systems can benefit from prioritizing the largest maintenance debt or parallelizing index cleanup, but benchmark I/O saturation, maintenance memory, worker contention, and completion time across the whole maintenance window. |
| Small nodes | Keep weights and parallelism conservative. One extra worker can be a large share of CPU, RAM, and storage queue depth; first fix thresholds and ensure autovacuum has enough time to finish. |
Pigsty
Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.
| Template | Effective value | Versus upstream boot | Source expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP | Unmodified | — | — |
| OLAP | Unmodified | — | — |
| CRIT | Unmodified | — | — |
| TINY | Unmodified | — | — |
Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; OLAP: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; TINY: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified. No Pigsty-specific rationale is inferred from an absent override.
Common pitfalls
- Treating the measured boot_val for autovacuum_max_parallel_workers as proof of the effective value on an initialized or managed cluster.
- Applying a change as though it were immediate while pg_settings reports sighup context.
- Changing this setting in isolation without checking the linked limits, observability, and rollback path.
- Depending on beta behavior in production without retesting the PostgreSQL 19 final release.
Related parameters
autovacuum_max_workers · autovacuum_worker_slots · max_parallel_workers · maintenance_work_mem · autovacuum_work_mem
References
- PostgreSQL 19 Beta 3 — autovacuum_max_parallel_workers
- PostgreSQL 19 release notes
- Machine-readable GUC export