password_expiration_warning_threshold
Fact — official short description: “Threshold for password expiration warnings.”
Identity
Lifecycle
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| First observed | PG19 Beta 3 |
| Present in | PG19 Beta 3 |
| Removed in | No |
| Introduction commit | 1d92e0c2cc47 — Add password expiration warnings. |
| Commit date | 2026-02-11 |
| Discussion | thread 1 |
Default history
| Versions | Raw boot_val |
Unit | Human value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG19 Beta 3 | 604800 |
s |
7 d |
How it works
PostgreSQL describes password_expiration_warning_threshold as follows: “Threshold for password expiration warnings.” A configuration reload applies the value to the server without a full restart. The atlas measures it in PG19 Beta 3; boot_val is the compiled or initialized baseline, not proof of a running cluster’s effective setting.
After successful password authentication, PostgreSQL warns when a role with VALID UNTIL has less than this interval remaining. Zero disables the warning; the default seven-day window is advisory and does not create, rotate, or extend credentials, and non-password authentication does not make password expiry management automatic.
Read it together with password_encryption, authentication_timeout, md5_password_warnings, hba_file. Check SHOW and pg_settings on the target server, verify the source and pending_restart fields, and compare workload, logs, and resource metrics before and after any change.
Tuning advice
Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.
| Workload | Guidance |
|---|---|
| OLTP | Roll out through staged clients, validate certificate selection and expiry warnings, and monitor authentication failures. Keep a tested fallback and treat file permissions and secret rotation as part of the same change. |
| OLAP | Apply the same security policy to batch drivers and long-lived ETL connections. Test clients that omit SNI, credential-expiry automation, reload behavior, and certificate-chain compatibility. |
| Small nodes | Prefer a simple, documented TLS and credential policy. Do not enable multi-certificate routing without a test for every hostname and fallback path, and never weaken verification to hide configuration mistakes. |
Pigsty
Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.
| Template | Effective value | Versus upstream boot | Source expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP | Unmodified | — | — |
| OLAP | Unmodified | — | — |
| CRIT | Unmodified | — | — |
| TINY | Unmodified | — | — |
Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; OLAP: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified; TINY: PG19 Beta 3 unmodified. No Pigsty-specific rationale is inferred from an absent override.
Common pitfalls
- Treating the measured boot_val for password_expiration_warning_threshold as proof of the effective value on an initialized or managed cluster.
- Applying a change as though it were immediate while pg_settings reports sighup context.
- Changing this setting in isolation without checking the linked limits, observability, and rollback path.
- Depending on beta behavior in production without retesting the PostgreSQL 19 final release.
Related parameters
password_encryption · authentication_timeout · md5_password_warnings · hba_file
References
- PostgreSQL 19 Beta 3 — password_expiration_warning_threshold
- PostgreSQL 19 release notes
- Machine-readable GUC export