Skip to content

parallel_setup_cost

parallel_setup_cost — Sets the planner’s estimate of the cost of starting up worker processes for parallel query. Observed in PG9.6–19 Beta 3; its last measured boot default is 1000 in PG19 Beta 3, with user context. This is a beta-snapshot fact and can change before PostgreSQL 19 GA.
Note

Fact — official short description: “Sets the planner’s estimate of the cost of starting up worker processes for parallel query.”

Identity

Type , Valuereal
Upstream pg_settings type
Context , Valueuser
Settable by an ordinary user
Unit , Value
Raw unit
Range , Value01.79769e+308
Raw limits in the last observed version
Enum values , Value
— for non-enum types
Category , ValueQuery Tuning / Planner Cost Constants
Upstream classification
Latest boot value , Value1000
1000

Lifecycle

Fact Value
First observed PG9.6
Present in PG9.6–19 Beta 3
Removed in No
Introduction commit 3bd909b22093 — Add a Gather executor node.
Commit date 2015-09-30
Discussion

Default history

Measured PG9.0–19 Beta 3 boot defaults
Versions Raw boot_val Unit Human value
PG9.6–19 Beta 3 1000 1000

How it works

parallel_setup_cost models the fixed overhead of launching parallel workers for a plan. It is one term in estimated path cost and does not allocate resources or change executor behavior directly.

Planner cost units are arbitrary and only their ratios matter. Scaling all cost constants together leaves path ordering unchanged; changing one alters the balance between I/O, row processing, operators, and parallel overhead.

The value is consulted when a plan is built. Statistics, row-count estimates, cache assumptions, tablespace overrides, and enabled plan methods can outweigh a small change in this constant. Its user context permits session- or transaction-local changes; newly performed or newly planned work sees the value.

Tuning advice

Tip

Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.

Workload Guidance
OLTP Calibrate parallel_setup_cost only from a representative workload, not one plan. First correct stale statistics and compare EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) estimates with reality; use role or tablespace scope where possible.
OLAP Analytical workloads can justify a different CPU-versus-I/O balance, but change parallel_setup_cost together with the related cost model and validate the full scan/join/aggregate mix.
Small nodes Keep the upstream value unless repeated evidence shows a systematic modeling error. On small systems, concurrency and cache residency often matter more than fine-grained changes to parallel_setup_cost.

Pigsty

Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.

Template Effective value Versus upstream boot Source expression
OLTP 2000 different 2000
OLAP Unmodified
CRIT 2000 different 2000
TINY Unmodified
Caution

Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 = 2000 (dcs); OLAP: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 = 2000 (dcs); TINY: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 unmodified. Advice, pending human review — Editorial inference, pending maintainer review: Doubling the setup estimate in OLTP/crit is intended to reduce parallel-plan selection without disabling it; OLAP and tiny retain upstream behavior.

Common pitfalls

  • Interpreting the value as elapsed time or a hard resource limit.
  • Tuning it to repair one query and regressing the wider workload.
  • Changing cost constants before correcting statistics and cardinality estimates.
  • Forgetting that only relative values influence path choice.

parallel_tuple_cost · max_parallel_workers_per_gather · min_parallel_table_scan_size · max_parallel_workers

References