parallel_setup_cost
Fact — official short description: “Sets the planner’s estimate of the cost of starting up worker processes for parallel query.”
Identity
Lifecycle
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| First observed | PG9.6 |
| Present in | PG9.6–19 Beta 3 |
| Removed in | No |
| Introduction commit | 3bd909b22093 — Add a Gather executor node. |
| Commit date | 2015-09-30 |
| Discussion | — |
Default history
| Versions | Raw boot_val |
Unit | Human value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG9.6–19 Beta 3 | 1000 |
— | 1000 |
How it works
parallel_setup_cost models the fixed overhead of launching parallel workers for a plan. It is one term in estimated path cost and does not allocate resources or change executor behavior directly.
Planner cost units are arbitrary and only their ratios matter. Scaling all cost constants together leaves path ordering unchanged; changing one alters the balance between I/O, row processing, operators, and parallel overhead.
The value is consulted when a plan is built. Statistics, row-count estimates, cache assumptions, tablespace overrides, and enabled plan methods can outweigh a small change in this constant. Its user context permits session- or transaction-local changes; newly performed or newly planned work sees the value.
Tuning advice
Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.
| Workload | Guidance |
|---|---|
| OLTP | Calibrate parallel_setup_cost only from a representative workload, not one plan. First correct stale statistics and compare EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) estimates with reality; use role or tablespace scope where possible. |
| OLAP | Analytical workloads can justify a different CPU-versus-I/O balance, but change parallel_setup_cost together with the related cost model and validate the full scan/join/aggregate mix. |
| Small nodes | Keep the upstream value unless repeated evidence shows a systematic modeling error. On small systems, concurrency and cache residency often matter more than fine-grained changes to parallel_setup_cost. |
Pigsty
Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.
| Template | Effective value | Versus upstream boot | Source expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP | 2000 |
different | 2000 |
| OLAP | Unmodified | — | — |
| CRIT | 2000 |
different | 2000 |
| TINY | Unmodified | — | — |
Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 = 2000 (dcs); OLAP: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 = 2000 (dcs); TINY: PG9.6–19 Beta 3 unmodified. Advice, pending human review — Editorial inference, pending maintainer review: Doubling the setup estimate in OLTP/crit is intended to reduce parallel-plan selection without disabling it; OLAP and tiny retain upstream behavior.
Common pitfalls
- Interpreting the value as elapsed time or a hard resource limit.
- Tuning it to repair one query and regressing the wider workload.
- Changing cost constants before correcting statistics and cardinality estimates.
- Forgetting that only relative values influence path choice.
Related parameters
parallel_tuple_cost · max_parallel_workers_per_gather · min_parallel_table_scan_size · max_parallel_workers