cursor_tuple_fraction
Fact — official short description: “Sets the planner’s estimate of the fraction of a cursor’s rows that will be retrieved.”
Identity
Lifecycle
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| First observed | PG9.0 (research boundary) |
| Present in | PG9.0–19 Beta 3 |
| Removed in | No |
| Introduction commit | Not asserted: predates the PG9.0 research boundary |
| Commit date | — |
| Discussion | — |
Default history
| Versions | Raw boot_val |
Unit | Human value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG9.0–19 Beta 3 | 0.1 |
— | 0.1 |
How it works
cursor_tuple_fraction tells the planner what fraction of a cursor’s result is expected to be fetched. Lower fractions give more weight to startup cost; 1.0 plans like an ordinary query that consumes the full result.
The estimate can change join order and access paths by preferring a fast first row even when total execution would be slower. It does not stop FETCH after that fraction and is not a row limit.
It is consulted at planning time for cursor plans. Application behavior matters: cursors used for pagination, early exit, or full export have very different appropriate fractions. Its user context permits session- or transaction-local changes; newly performed or newly planned work sees the value.
Tuning advice
Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.
| Workload | Guidance |
|---|---|
| OLTP | Keep cursor_tuple_fraction at its upstream default unless representative plans show a repeatable, workload-wide problem. Test a local override first and include planning latency as well as execution latency. |
| OLAP | Analytical SQL can make cursor_tuple_fraction more visible because joins, cursors, or recursion are larger. Benchmark the full statement family and inspect estimates rather than copying a single successful value. |
| Small nodes | On a small host, avoid increasing planning search or memory pressure through cursor_tuple_fraction without a measured benefit. Prefer query-local structure or a scoped role setting over a cluster-wide override. |
Pigsty
Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.
| Template | Effective value | Versus upstream boot | Source expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP | Unmodified | — | — |
| OLAP | Unmodified | — | — |
| CRIT | Unmodified | — | — |
| TINY | Unmodified | — | — |
Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; OLAP: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; TINY: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified. No Pigsty-specific rationale is inferred from an absent override.
Common pitfalls
- Treating cursor_tuple_fraction as an executor resource limit rather than a planning assumption or policy.
- Testing only one parameter set or one data distribution.
- Expecting an already cached plan to be rewritten automatically.
- Using a global override to hide stale statistics or fragile SQL structure.
Related parameters
plan_cache_mode · random_page_cost · enable_nestloop · enable_indexscan
References
- PostgreSQL 19 Beta 3 — cursor_tuple_fraction
- PostgreSQL 19 release notes
- Machine-readable GUC export