Skip to content

cursor_tuple_fraction

cursor_tuple_fraction — Sets the planner’s estimate of the fraction of a cursor’s rows that will be retrieved. Observed in PG9.0–19 Beta 3; its last measured boot default is 0.1 in PG19 Beta 3, with user context. This is a beta-snapshot fact and can change before PostgreSQL 19 GA.
Note

Fact — official short description: “Sets the planner’s estimate of the fraction of a cursor’s rows that will be retrieved.”

Identity

Type , Valuereal
Upstream pg_settings type
Context , Valueuser
Settable by an ordinary user
Unit , Value
Raw unit
Range , Value01
Raw limits in the last observed version
Enum values , Value
— for non-enum types
Category , ValueQuery Tuning / Other Planner Options
Upstream classification
Latest boot value , Value0.1
0.1

Lifecycle

Fact Value
First observed PG9.0 (research boundary)
Present in PG9.0–19 Beta 3
Removed in No
Introduction commit Not asserted: predates the PG9.0 research boundary
Commit date
Discussion

Default history

Measured PG9.0–19 Beta 3 boot defaults
Versions Raw boot_val Unit Human value
PG9.0–19 Beta 3 0.1 0.1

How it works

cursor_tuple_fraction tells the planner what fraction of a cursor’s result is expected to be fetched. Lower fractions give more weight to startup cost; 1.0 plans like an ordinary query that consumes the full result.

The estimate can change join order and access paths by preferring a fast first row even when total execution would be slower. It does not stop FETCH after that fraction and is not a row limit.

It is consulted at planning time for cursor plans. Application behavior matters: cursors used for pagination, early exit, or full export have very different appropriate fractions. Its user context permits session- or transaction-local changes; newly performed or newly planned work sees the value.

Tuning advice

Tip

Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.

Workload Guidance
OLTP Keep cursor_tuple_fraction at its upstream default unless representative plans show a repeatable, workload-wide problem. Test a local override first and include planning latency as well as execution latency.
OLAP Analytical SQL can make cursor_tuple_fraction more visible because joins, cursors, or recursion are larger. Benchmark the full statement family and inspect estimates rather than copying a single successful value.
Small nodes On a small host, avoid increasing planning search or memory pressure through cursor_tuple_fraction without a measured benefit. Prefer query-local structure or a scoped role setting over a cluster-wide override.

Pigsty

Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.

Template Effective value Versus upstream boot Source expression
OLTP Unmodified
OLAP Unmodified
CRIT Unmodified
TINY Unmodified
Caution

Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; OLAP: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified; TINY: PG9.0–19 Beta 3 unmodified. No Pigsty-specific rationale is inferred from an absent override.

Common pitfalls

  • Treating cursor_tuple_fraction as an executor resource limit rather than a planning assumption or policy.
  • Testing only one parameter set or one data distribution.
  • Expecting an already cached plan to be rewritten automatically.
  • Using a global override to hide stale statistics or fragile SQL structure.

plan_cache_mode · random_page_cost · enable_nestloop · enable_indexscan

References