wal_recycle
Fact — official short description: “Recycles WAL files by renaming them.”
Identity
Lifecycle
| Fact | Value |
|---|---|
| First observed | PG12 |
| Present in | PG12–19 Beta 3 |
| Removed in | No |
| Introduction commit | 475861b2615d — Add wal_recycle and wal_init_zero GUCs. |
| Commit date | 2019-04-02 |
| Discussion | thread 1 |
Default history
| Versions | Raw boot_val |
Unit | Human value |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG12–19 Beta 3 | on |
— | on |
How it works
Recycles WAL files by renaming them. A superuser or a role granted SET privilege can change it for the relevant session or configuration scope.
With on, PostgreSQL renames no-longer-needed WAL segments for future use rather than creating new files. Reuse is usually cheaper, but on copy-on-write storage fresh allocation can perform better and avoid preserving extents.
Monitor and change wal_recycle together with wal_init_zero, wal_segment_size, min_wal_size. Validate on the relevant server role and real workload, then use its superuser context to choose session change, reload, or restart; a historical boot default is not the current effective value.
Tuning advice
Advice. These are workload-specific starting points and must be validated with measurements.
| Workload | Guidance |
|---|---|
| OLTP | Establish durability and recovery objectives first, then tune wal_recycle from WAL rate, flush latency, checkpoints, and peak pg_wal usage. Validate every change with crash/recovery and archive monitoring. |
| OLAP | Provision WAL, archive bandwidth, and recovery I/O for bulk-load peaks. Coordinate load pacing and checkpoints when reducing spikes; never break the recovery chain for throughput. |
| Small nodes | Start from safe defaults or the measured Pigsty value and set explicit alerts for limited disk capacity. Do not disable durability or break the recovery chain merely to save modest I/O. |
Pigsty
Values use the fixed 8-vCPU, 32-GiB, 100-GiB SSD fixture and render the current Pigsty templates for PG19 Beta 3; this does not assert current Pigsty support for that historical or beta release.
| Template | Effective value | Versus upstream boot | Source expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| OLTP | Unmodified | — | — |
| OLAP | Unmodified | — | — |
| CRIT | Unmodified | — | — |
| TINY | Unmodified | — | — |
Advice — pending human review. Fact from the current Pigsty template projection: OLTP: PG12–19 Beta 3 unmodified; OLAP: PG12–19 Beta 3 unmodified; CRIT: PG12–19 Beta 3 unmodified; TINY: PG12–19 Beta 3 unmodified. No Pigsty-specific rationale is inferred from an absent override.
Common pitfalls
- Assuming recycled renames are always faster than new allocation on copy-on-write storage.
- Disabling recycling without measuring segment creation latency during WAL bursts.
- Expecting a session change to alter files already recycled or removed.
- Treating recycling as a WAL retention limit rather than a file-reuse policy.
Related parameters
wal_init_zero · wal_segment_size · min_wal_size · max_wal_size · commit_delay · commit_siblings